You are browsing the archive for Musical Expression.

Turn Any Setback into Success

Isabelle Jeannet, concert pianist and advanced teacher

Isabelle Jeannet, concert pianist and advanced teacher

Sometimes a huge setback can fuel your greatest success.  After two surgeries on her hand, concert pianist Isabelle Jeannet was forced to put her performance career on hold.  During this time, she intensely studied hand movements of many great piano masters.  What she learned dramatically transformed her concept of playing piano, and formed the foundation of her current teaching method.

Today this native of Switzerland teaches advanced piano students and performs all around the world.  She performs solo works, accompanies singers, and is a featured performer in chamber ensembles, choirs, and orchestras.  Isabelle Jeannet shares with us her story and her secrets to turning any setback into success.

Our Interview with Isabelle Jeannet

What defines your teaching method with your advanced-level students?

 1)      It’s all in the hands. When you are watching Horowitz, Cartot or other great artists it always looks completely effortless and relaxed.  In my playing or teaching, I have that ideal in mind.  I concentrate a lot on relaxation.  I combine flat and round fingers, and the thumb hangs below the keys when not being used.  Playing a melody with flat fingers completely changes the sound.

2)      Phrasing and expression.  What we receive as a beautiful, rich sound often has to do with the lengths of a particular note, the breathing in between two or more notes, or a phrase and the freedom of a well-chosen rubato.  The agogics are highly important to create a vibrant performance and it’s the instinct of a good teacher guiding a student here.

3)      Focus on the whole person.  Teaching my advanced-level students is the most fun, deep, close and emotional experience for me.  I love creating an atmosphere of trust, which helps the student to bring out more of their abilities, their personality and also their fears.  If something isn’t working in the playing, it’s always deeply connected with the whole person and I see myself there as more than “just” a piano teacher.

Pianist Hands

Isabelle Jeannet's method focuses on the combination of rounded and flat finger positions.

When did you start studying music?  How did you know you wanted to be a concert pianist?

I got my first piano lesson at the age of eight.  My parents would often listen to classical music and there was never a doubt that I would choose the piano as my favorite instrument.

I loved practicing but didn’t have a career as a wonder child, nor was I forced by anyone to sit at the piano.  Everything I did, I always did out of free will.  To become a pianist was a dream I had since I was a child.  At the age of thirteen, I increased my practicing so I could enter the University at the age of seventeen.

What have you noticed about the differences in your audiences?

In Dubai people didn’t mind talking on their mobile phones while I was performing.  Then I played in a jail and it was so emotionally intense you would have heard a pin drop.  It depends very much on habits, social dynamics, environment, and country.  It all matters.

What stays the same if I’m teaching or performing is the emotional language of the music that touches on the level of the heart.  In general, any audience that is educated in classical music is usually listening with intention.

How do you manage your scheduling as a performer?

Until now I have done all the scheduling and booking on my own.  As teaching has always been an important part of my work, I haven’t had room in my schedule for numerous concerts.  The concerts I’ve played have largely come through personal connections.  Also, when I’ve had the chance to meet somebody important, I also get the concert.

The recent economic downturn has changed the situation with agencies dramatically.  We used to have a list for agencies all over Switzerland and about two thirds of them have completely vanished.  I do believe in a good online presence today and I’m also convinced that I’ll find somebody helping me with the booking soon!

How can musicians eliminate distraction?

Playing classical music requires a lot of time.  Classical music was composed at a time when people in general had less distraction in their lives.  As our world gets faster and faster, I think it’s important to create islands of silence and freedom.  I know how fast one can get lost by multimedia, etc.

Isabelle Jeannet IIWhat is your dream?

My vision as an artist is to “infect” my audience with my love for the classical music.  It’s so important that this music be kept alive!  I would love to show that classical music is something very sexy and passionate and to find ways to attract a younger audience.

I have a dream about a different furnished small hall with a touch of an elegant bar instead of a usual concert hall—a modern version of a saloon when Chopin used to play his works for the first time.

Inspiration for Good

Few things in this world are as inspiring as watching a concert pianist perform.  Among her many influences, Isabelle Jeannet sites Alfred Cortot, Vladimir Horowitz, Clara Haskil, Martha Argerich, Joseph Hoffmann, ­­ Edwin Fischer, Claudio Arrau, and Peter Feuchtwanger, with whom she is also friends.  She received her teaching and concert diplomas at the Hochschule für Musik und Theater in Bern.

Classical Doesn’t Mean “Stuffy”! How Pops Orchestras Keep Music Fun

Classical Music Isn't Always Serious

Far from stuffy, Pops Orchestras appeal to a vast audience as they showcase light classics.

For many people, classical music is the gold standard for serious artistry.  However, many non-musicians assume that all classical music is always serious.  On the contrary, classical music is much more versatile than that!  It is fun, humorous, witty, and even irreverent when it wants to be.

Pops orchestras keep the fun alive by playing lighter classics and popular songs.  Their performances elicit laughter and produce memories for the whole family.  There may be one or more in your state.  Some popular orchestras include:

  • Arizona has the Tucson Pops Orchestra
  • California has the Golden State Pops Orchestra in LA, the Pasadena Pops and San Francisco Pops
  • Florida has two: the Palm Beach and the Panama City Pops Orchestras
  • Massachusetts has the Boston Pops Orchestra
  • Minnesota has the Minneapolis Pops Orchestra
  • New York’s got the New York Pops Orchestra
  • North Carolina has the Carolina Pops Orchestra
  • Ohio has two: the Cincinnati and the Cleveland Pops Orchestras
  • Pennsylvania has the Philly Pops Orchestra

Additionally, some universities have their own pops orchestras, such as the:

    • Harvard Pops Orchestra in Massachusetts
    • University of Michigan Pops Orchestra
    • Davenport Pops Orchestra at Yale University in Connecticut

International pops orchestras include the:

  • De La Salle Pops Orchestra in the Phillipines
  • Twilite Orchestra in Indonesia
  • Queensland Pops Orchestra in Australia

Others include:

  • The Hollywood Bowl Orchestra in California
  • The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, which plays both serious and light classical music

It’s reassuring to know that one need not look outside the classical realm for a little light night music.

The Mahler Effect

The Mahler Effect

Gustav Mahler Conducts the Vienna Philharmonic, by by Max Oppenheimer, 1935

I was so moved the first time I saw Gustav Mahler Conducts the Vienna Philharmonic at the Belvedere in Vienna, Austria.  It may not look extraordinary in a pixilated rendering, but its life-size original is breathtaking. 

The mark of a great painting is its appeal to more senses than just sight.  In this painting, not only can you see the wind blowing through everybody’s hair; you feel it.  Though non-existent, you become convinced that there’s an actual breeze in the room.  This effect blurs the separation between the artwork in front of you and your reality on the other side of it.  You are transported from your world into Max Oppenheimer’s fantasy.  It thrills and frightens you at the same time.

As you analyze the windy effect of this painting, a riddle emerges.  The Golden Hall doesn’t have windows, so . . . aha!  The epiphany appears.  It’s not a literal gust of wind that Oppenheimer paints so eloquently.  It’s the unearthly whirlwind of passion that sweeps up each orchestra member—and you, the viewer.  It’s rather Pentecostal in nature.  The solemnity of said passion is expressed in everybody’s prayer-like closed eyes and bowed heads.

One would think this painting has inspired so many orchestra members around the world to grow their hair out–as indeed, many have.  What is more becoming of a musician than a swooshy, aerodynamic hairstyle?  As a violinist sways with each bow stroke, his hair punctuates each movement.  What a brilliant way to get the audience more visually involved in the performance!

Few paintings capture the dynamic movement of orchestral music as well as this masterpiece does.   The wind effect is largely to credit for this.  The brush strokes themselves are lively and add to the sense of mobility.  The timpani player’s multiple mallet heads clearly illustrate a rapid drum roll.

Max’s decision to squish everybody together helps, too.  Each player’s individuality becomes irrelevant as they perform, move and breathe as one musical organism.  Mahler is the nucleus, the DNA code, the brain and heart, the mastermind.  Every line in the painting points directly to him, as he’s placed conveniently at the center of all activity.

Despite the sheer amazingness of this aesthetic gem, hardly anyone has heard of it outside of Vienna.  I couldn’t find any historical information on the painting online, and a search through print materials was equally hapless.  Perhaps I was wise to forgo my original dissertation idea in college.  I wanted to explore how artistic portrayals of Gustav Mahler reflected European ideologies of the time.  Due to the lack of reliable information, I abandoned the project.  I hope one of these days some more daring student will pick up where I left off.

How to Make It through a Sad Song

How to Make It through a Sad Song

Singing a tragic tune is rough. Just one teardrop will muddle the clarity of the voice. Learn the tricks to get over the tears.

When I began studying the role of Lily in The Secret Garden musical, I could not get through her songs without bawling.  Lily is a ghost who haunts her grieving husband and abandoned child.  Since I have a family of my own, Lily’s songs hit a nerve each time I attempted to sing them.

Sometimes you’ll have to sing a song that makes you burst into tears.  Unlike straight drama, you can’t get away with crying while singing.  The tears and snot drip right into your vocal instrument, interfering with voice production.  Gross.

In some contemporary singing styles, rawness can add color, but not in classical singing.  Crying just doesn’t . . . work.  When caught in a tearful dilemma, being convincing is not the singer’s problem; it’s figuring out how to be less expressive!

Take these steps to heart the next time you must get through a sad song without losing it:

Step 1: Cry it Out

Suppressing the urge to cry just makes you want to cry more.  Don’t bottle up your feelings.  Spend an entire day crying over it.  If necessary, spend a whole week crying over it.  Treat this predicament you’re in as seriously as you would the grieving process.  If you don’t give time to releasing your feelings, they will continue bothering you when you perform.

Step 2: Let it Wash Over You

Listen to as many recordings of the song as possible.  If no recordings are available, record yourself singing it and listen to yourself over and over again.  This is good to do when learning any song, but especially as you’re learning music that makes you emotional.

Step 3: Sing it Over and Over

Sing the song and allow yourself to weep.  The sting will lessen with time.  Meanwhile, you’ll learn how to sing through your crying.  This skill will rescue you in emergencies when you get emotional during performance.

Step 4: Write it Out

Verbalize what you are feeling.  Write down your thoughts and read them aloud to yourself.  Feel free to share these thoughts with a trusted friend.  Articulate what you’re feeling in the mirror.  You can never understand your feelings too much, especially as a performer.

Step 5: Do Something Else

If after cycling through these steps you still don’t feel better, do something else.  Take out the trash.  Go for a walk.  Work out at the gym.  Talk to a good friend.  Volunteer at a soup kitchen.  Take a bubble bath.  Do anything to get your mind off the song.  An active pastime followed by a relaxing exercise is most recommended.

Step 6: Meditate and Draw

Close your eyes and imagine yourself performing the song.  Visualize yourself doing so successfully.  What do you sound like?  What do you look like?  What do you see around you?  Take note of as many other details as you can.  Act like a little kid and draw what you see.  Let your right brain indulge in this sensory experience.

Step 7: Try Again

Since you’ve taken time to cry it out, think deeply about it, forget about it, and ponder it, you have hopefully taken the edge off the pain by now.  Try singing the song again.

Step 8: Rinse and Repeat

If you’re still bawling, don’t give up.  Repeat these steps in whatever order helps you the most.  If your efforts seem futile, don’t be shy about seeking professional help.  There may be unresolved issues that need addressing—not just so you can get through the song, but so you can live a happier life.

Treasure Negative Feedback

Treasure Negative Feedback

The critique that hurts actually helps the most.

Open rebuke is better than secret love (Proverbs 27:5).

A few years ago, a good friend of mine related to me what had happened to him during an audition for a prestigious company.  After singing his songs, the panelists gave him immediate feedback.  First, they made it clear that they would not accept him into their company.  Secondly, they told him he needed to learn how to stay on pitch.  That was a hard criticism for him to accept, since he had trained intensively in classical voice for years.  As if that didn’t smart enough, the judges also advised him to lose weight—“At least twenty pounds”, they said.

Ouch.  Upon hearing his story, I was glad to have foregone my own audition for that institution.  However, in the years following that episode, I have come to value such feedback.  Having gained more audition experience, I realize that criticism is the most valuable thing a performer can receive.

How can this be?  Isn’t getting the part you want the whole point of auditions?  Sure, landing a desired role or post within a company is more valuable to your ego and your wallet in the short-term.  In the long-run, however, criticism drives the artists to improve far more than acceptance or praise ever does.

Why musicians take it personally

Since the very nature of music is emotional, it is very hard for artists to separate their performance from their egos.  When someone criticizes your performance, it’s as if they were criticizing you.  This is especially true for singers because the instrument is a physical part of oneself.  If somebody tells you they don’t like your voice or the way you use it, it feels as though they’re really saying that they don’t like you as a person.

One solution to this dilemma is to avoid criticism altogether.  To some artists, pleasing themselves is more important than pleasing their spectators.  Either the judges like it and they’ll hire the performer, or they don’t, in which case the performer would prefer not to work with them anyway.

For performers who are only concerned with pleasing themselves, the confidential nature of the audition is very convenient.  They don’t care to know the judges reasons for rejecting them.  They’ll simply move onto another audition, and another, until a job is landed.

Why musicians don’t learn from auditions.

Unfortunately, auditioners rarely receive any feedback from the panelists at all.    Most of the time, you go in there, show them your stuff, and they politely dismiss you.  You never hear from them again.  What they think of you forever remains a mystery to you.

As a result, most performers measure their success in a pass-fail manner: did they get the role or not?  There is no in-between.  Either the audition was perfect because they landed the role, or it was a failure because they didn’t.

How do you counter this?  The real solution would be if all the panelists would offer immediate feedback.  “Your singing was beautiful, but it lacked authenticity.”  Or, “Your instrument is bright and clear, but we’re looking for a huskier sound.”

Sadly, we can’t count on that happening any time soon.  To delve into the reasons would take up more space than the author is willing to dedicate in this article.

What to do about it

For one thing, the performer can learn not to take rejection personally.  Since judges will rarely tell you why you didn’t make the cut, there’s no use in guessing.

To ease the pain of rejection, actor Trevor Nero[i] advises me to forget about every audition once it’s finished.  “Auditioning is a way of life”, he says.  “When you go in for a part, chances are, you’re going to get rejected.  You can’t afford to stake your hopes on getting the gig.  Rather than agonize over what you could have done better, forget all about it and move on.”

Since you won’t get it from judges very often, it’s important to actively seek feedback from other people.  I always encourage my clients to rehearse their pieces in front of friends, family, and whoever is willing to listen.  Do so with the intention of learning every awkward thing you do that distracts from the music making.  After the performance, collect honest information from your spectators.

Auditioning for the sake of it

In a world in which most judges will never give you constructive criticism, we can take advantage of auditioning simply for our own benefit.

I sometimes like to audition for roles that I almost know I won’t get.  These end up being the auditions I learn the most from.  I like to throw myself into roles that are so unlike my previous characters because this forces me to think, observe, and fight with myself in ways I wouldn’t otherwise.  The process of creating harmony within oneself where there is dissonance and lack of understanding is more thrilling to me than always auditioning for the same cookie-cutter roles I always have done before.

I recently auditioned for such a role that was outside my comfort zone.  As such, I didn’t expect to get the part.  My friends, upon learning that I didn’t get the role,, felt very sad and sorry for me.  I told them they really didn’t need to, because the purpose of my audition was to gain experience.

Having said that, I wish with all my heart I could get some feedback on my performance—especially of these challenging roles.  I wish a director would tell me, “You played that too vulnerably.  I’m looking for indelible strength.”  Or, “Stop acting!  Show me the real you!”  Or maybe even, “You’re very authentic, but you’re just too attractive.”  Now there’s a criticism I would be keen to receive.


[i] Name has been changed to respect his privacy.